Nov 09 - (Excerpts) - Now that some enterprising and possibly
conscience-stricken soul has served up the emails and other data of
the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,
revealing the deliberate efforts to hide the corrupted research that
justifies the “global warming” fraud, all the various journalists
and alleged climate scientists who have been a party to it are
trying desperately to cover up or minimize the scandal.
The truth is, those closely allied with the United Nations’
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have been
suppressing the real science, substituting their own corrupted data,
and trying to avoid the process of “peer review” by which other
scientists, the real ones, can test the data for accuracy and
Thousands of real scientists have signed petitions over the years
demanding that global warming claims be submitted to rigorous
In England, its Freedom of Information Act, similar to that in the
U.S., had been used to demand the data supporting the global warming
theory which, at one point, Phil Jones, the CRU director, claimed
had been “lost.” Reportedly, Jones has attracted more than $22
million in grants to the CRU for climate research!
His colleague, Michael Mann of Pennsylvania State University, became
famous for concocting a “hockey stick” graph that depicted a sudden
rise in the Earth’s temperature that was later revealed to have been
falsified, but these concoctions have been used for decades by the
IPCC to claim that global warming is real and on-going.
You can be sure, however, that the global warming journalists whose
careers have been based on furthering the fraud will continue to
emphasize the “hacking” theory to suggest this “stolen” data lacks
merit and those using it, the so-called “skeptics” and “deniers” are
still not to be trusted.
Estimates of the amount of money the U.S. has spent on all manner of
“research” and related programs peg the figure at
or more. That’s a lot of money for something that was NOT happening
and in 1998 the Earth entered a natural cooling cycle; one in which
we’re likely be for two decades more or longer.
All of this is exacerbated by the fact that the President of the
United States will briefly attend the forthcoming December UN
Conference of the Parties on Climate Change being held in
Copenhagen. He has made it clear that he believes the false data put
forth by the IPCC and wants the U.S. to sign a treaty that would
yield U.S. sovereignty to the United Nations.
It would destroy what's left of our battered, debt-ridden economy.
The battle now is to force the mainstream media to tell the truth
about “global warming” and to find out just how many billions of
taxpayers dollars have been squandered on junk climate science and
policies detrimental to the nation.
As for President Obama, he should just pick up his Nobel Peace Prize
in Oslo, Norway, give another florid speech, get on Air Force One,
and come home.