Not by Fire but by Ice


Discover What Killed the Dinosaurs . . . and Why it Could Soon Kill Us


Hacked files reveal global warming is a deliberate fraud
By Dr. Timothy Ball

21 Nov 09 – (Excerpts) – Global Warming is often called a hoax. I disagree because a hoax has a humorous intent to puncture pomposity. The argument that global warming is due to humans known as the anthropogenic global warming theory (AGW) is a deliberate fraud. I can now make that statement without fear of contradiction because the (hacked files) provide not just a smoking gun, but an entire battery of machine guns.

Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia

The files contain papers, documents letters and emails. The latter are the most damaging and contain blunt information about the degree of manipulation of climate science in general and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in particular.

                        Climate science hijacked and corrupted

Dominant names involved are ones I have followed throughout my career including, Phil Jones, Benjamin Santer, Michael Mann, Kevin Trenberth, Jonathan Overpeck, Ken Briffa and Tom Wigley. I have watched climate science hijacked and corrupted by this small group of scientists.

Jones claims the files were obtained illegally as if that absolves the content. It doesn’t and it is enough to destroy all their careers. Jones gave a foretaste of his behavior in 2005.

Warwick Hughes asked for the data and method he used for his claim of a 0.6C temperature rise since the end of the nineteenth century. Jones responded,

    “We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the
      data available to you when your aim is to try and find something
      wrong with it?” 

He has stonewalled ever since. The main reason was because it was used as a key argument in the IPCC reports to convince the world humans caused rapid warming in the 20th century. The emails obtained are a frightening record of arrogance, and deception far beyond his 2005 effort.

Another glimpse into what the files and emails reveal was the report by Professor Deming. He wrote,

     “With publication of an article in Science (in 1995) I gained sufficient
       credibility in the community of scientists working on climate change.
      They thought I was one of them someone who would pervert science
      in the service of social and political causes. So one of them let his guard
      down. A major person working in the area of climate change and global
      warming sent me an astonishing email that said. “We must get rid of the
      Medieval Warm Period.”

The person in question was Jonathan Overpeck and his even more revealing emails are part of those exposed by the hacker. It is now very clear that Deming’s charge was precise. They have perverted science in the service of social and political causes.

I was always suspicious about why peer review was such a big deal. Now all my suspicions are confirmed. The emails reveal how (this small elite community of scientists) controlled the process, including manipulating some of the major journals like Science and Nature. We know the editor of the Journal of Climate, Andrew Weaver, was one of the “community”. They organized lists of reviewers when required making sure they gave the editor only favorable names. They threatened to isolate and marginalize one editor who they believed was recalcitrant.

                                                  Total Control

These people controlled the global weather data used by the IPCC through the joint Hadley and CRU and produced the HadCRUT data. They controlled the IPCC, especially crucial chapters and especially preparation of the Summary for Policy Makers (SPM). Stephen Schneider was a prime mover there from the earliest reports to the most influential in 2001. They also had a left wing conduit to the New York Times. The emails between Andy Revkin and the community are very revealing and must place his journalistic integrity in serious jeopardy.

                               Kyoto and the Copenhagen Accord
          based on completely falsified and manipulated data and science

Of course the IPCC Reports and especially the SPM Reports are the basis for Kyoto and the Copenhagen Accord, but now we know they are based on completely falsified and manipulated data and science. It is no longer a suspicion. Surely this is the death knell for the CRU, the IPCC, Kyoto and Copenhagen and the Carbon Credits shell game.

CO2 never was a problem and all the machinations and deceptions exposed by these files prove that it was the greatest deception in history.

See entire great article, entitled “The Death Blow to Climate Science”:
Thanks to Joe Herr for this link

See also Hacked files expose massive global warming con

See also Phil Jones has collected $22.6 million in grants





Order Book I Q & A I Book Reviews I Plant Hardiness Zone Maps I Radio Interviews I Table of Contents I Excerpts I Author Photo I Pacemaker of the Ice Ages I Extent of Previous Glaciation I Crane Buried in Antarctic Ice Sheet I Ice Ages and Magnetic Reversals I It's Ocean Warming I E-Mail Robert at l Expanding Glaciers