|
(Scroll to bottom of page to see comments
from readers)
19 Apr 09 - In a landmark decision long pushed for by some
environmentalists and
money-hungry politicians, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has
almost
officially declared CO2 -- AKA plant food, the air you exhale, the
bubbles in beer,
and the basis of all life -- a "pollutant", and causes global warming.
What are they talking about?
The Earth is cooling, for God’s sake!
Do not let the EPA and the
Obama administration continue to push the hoax of
the century on you.
We need CO2 just to stay
alive
CO2 is neither a pollutant nor a climate driver. We need CO2 just to
stay alive.
If the EPA succeeds in its
proposed finding, this will in effect give the government
the LEGAL ABILITY to tax and severely control nearly everything in our
lives,
ranging from driving your car all the way to switching on a television,
using a hairdryer,
mowing your lawn, or heaven forbid burning a candle, using your air
conditioner, or
burning wood in your fireplace.
The EPA’s new rules and
regulations could increase your energy bill by $3,000.00
per year. And that's just for starters.
This madness must be
stopped!
This EPA "finding" cannot be allowed. Millions of
people in the third world
will pay
with their lives for this outrageous way of thinking,
especially if this type of unscientific policy spreads around the world
as many environmentalists are hoping for. Countless
souls have already starved to death thanks to the nonsensical push for
biofuels which
has taken over food crops around the world. This madness must be
stopped.
The EPA is taking comments from the public for 60
days before their decision is
finalized, so please make your voices heard. Tell the legislators and
politicians that
we aren't going to fall for it, and tell them to throw their junk
science out the window
along with this ridiculous idea that carbon is "pollution".
Do it now, and spread the
word to everyone you know.
Submit your comments to the EPA
You can submit your comments
directly to this e-mail
address:
GHG-Endangerment-Docket@epa.gov
In the “subject” line of
your email, put the following:
“Comments directed to
Docket ID No.EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0171”
Then at the very beginning
of your email, say the same thing again:
“Comments directed to
Docket ID No.EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0171”
Tell
them that CO2 is not a pollutant, it’s a plant food, and refer them to
http://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/04/epa-doesnt-co2-time-to-make-our-voices.html
(If
you can figure out how to do it, you can also submit your comments
through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
http://www.regulations.gov.
It will allow you
to submit your comments anonymously.)
Refer to any of the
articles on my webpage
If you go to
www.iceagenow.com and click on the “Dissenters” tab at the top
of the page, you’ll find many, many scientists who disagree with the
man-made
global-warming scenario. You are welcome to refer to any of those
articles.
-
Tell them that we already have enough laws on the books.
-
Tell them that
CO2 does not cause climate change in any way, shape or form.
-
Tell them that
31,000 scientists dispute the UN's global warming claims
-
Tell them that the
Antarctic Ice Sheet is growing, not shrinking
-
Tell them that
glaciers are growing in California
-
Tell them that
Alaska's glaciers are growing for the first time in 250 years
-
Tell them that
the sun controls our climate, not man
-
Tell them that
Carbon is not causing global warming or climate change
Contact your Congressman
Then contact your Congressman and your Senator and ask them to stop the
madness! Tell them that you want them to take their hands out of your
wallet,
and their boots off of your back!
You must take action now!
Tell them NO!
You
have fewer than 60 days to protest the EPA's attack on your freedom.
.........................
Comments from readers:
EPA regulation of "greenhouse gases" is a threat to
America's
economy and will raise the cost of EVERYTHING we do
24 Apr 09 - Here’s a great response to the EPA.
See EPA Threat to America's
Economy
.
....................
Thanks for posting the info about this - hopefully
the EPA will be flooded (no pun intended - mostly) with e-mails about
this decision. Sadly I don't think they will do anything as they are of
the mindset that the science is settled and those who object are like
Sargent Schultz (we know nothing).
Thanks for the world-class website.
Lionel B. Dyck
....................
The EPA Instructions-comments instruction also says to suggest alternatives.
Stating that you prefer they do nothing is probably a good idea. Thanks
for all
the wonderful information and the great books.
Pete Joyce, La Luz, New Mexico
.....................
I think we have to address all the gases mentioned
by EPA, not only CO2 but also methane etc. We not only have to address
the EPA plans for control via the Clean
Air Act but also the Clean Water Act. Every protest will help and you
are right. We
have to stop this madness.
Ron de Haan
.......................
Comments directed to Docket ID
No.EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0171
I have just recently read about this and find
myself wondering how science and fantasy have managed to come together
at the EPA.
CO2 is only dangerous when one is in an enclosed/sealed area and the
exhaled CO2 replaces the O2 such that one is unable to get the necessary
O2 to survive.
Plants on the other hand *LOVE* CO2. The more CO2 they can get the
faster and bigger they grow.
The planet on the other hand could care less about CO2 as it neither
increases or decreases the mean temperature - that has been proven time
and again by many reputable scientists. The famous Al Gore CO2 chart
that demonstrated the relationship between CO2 and the mean temperature
has been proven false (you can find the evidence by looking at a chart
of the CO2 with the temperature on it and you will see that the CO2
increased *AFTER* the temperature increased.
Thus CO2 is not a problem and it is definitely not the cause of global
warming (or climate change).
Please recall your world history - why was Greenland called Greenland?
Because it was *NOT* covered in ice because the world wide mean
temperature was warmer than it is today. This is scientific and
historical fact. The world has also been colder, as when the Thames in
London froze over.
Use some common sense when you evaluate supposed scientific theories, as
that is what the CO2 issue is - a theory, and that theory has no
foundation in fact and can not be validated by the scientific method.
The cause of climate change is our SUN and its sunspot cycle. This has
been proven in numerous scientific articles with solid scientific facts
to prove the theory.
Please abandon your plans to regulate CO2 and lets finally acknowledge
that climate change is beyond the control of mankind.
(btw. how much CO2 and other gasses have the various volcanoes released
into the atmosphere recently - if CO2 is really a problem then we need
to find a way to plug the volcanoes).
Lionel B. Dyck
.......................
CO2 essential to the health and well-being of our bodies
21 Apr 09 - Here's an email from a reader (with a copy of her comments to
the
EPA) attesting to the benefits of CO2 in connection with respiratory
problems.
I had no idea that CO2 could help asthma and allergy sufferers.
See
CO2 essential to the health and well-being of our bodies
..........................
Comments
directed to
Docket ID No.EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0171
Carbon dioxide is not a
pollutant, it is a plant food. The present increase in CO2 levels
is beneficial to our planet, whereas regulation of CO2 would be grossly
detrimental.
The simple science is that oxygen is produced by plants which they
exhale after they have taken in CO2 and converted it to sugars for their
growth. Plants require CO2 to exist just as we humans require oxygen. As
the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere increases, the plants grow
more vigorously. Current levels of atmospheric CO2 stand at 385 ppm, but
research shows that plants grow most vigorously at 1000 to 1200 ppm.
This
information is used by commercial greenhouses who pump in up to 1200 ppm,
which increases yields by a factor of four. And there is
an environmental side benefit because the plants then use less water.
This
information comes from long-time climatologist Dr. Timothy Ball. For
more data on the benefits of CO2, see
http://www.iceagenow.com/Carbon_is_not_causing_global_warming_or_climate_change.htm
Please
drop any plans for regulating CO2.
Sincerely,
Robert W. Felix |